It
was obvious that the Mahinda Chinthanaya included the abolition of the Executive
Presidency as part of its main themes, as it was a politically popular move, crafted
to get votes and nothing else. Once in power the Govt. had NO intention of doing
so. So it must be said of anyone else in the opposition making it a plank of their
cry. Whilst SF appears to make it one of his main aims, we know from practice the
utterings of SF during the last Presidential Election, of nothing but dictatorial
promises, that could not be further from the theme set forth above.
So
it is with this recent rally, which was staged for the abolition as one of its main
aims. These people are barking up the wrong tree here. It requires consensus amongst
many parties for a near unanimous vote. It is unlikely to happen. It is completely
within the power of the current incumbent so to do, however he shows not the slightest
inclination to do so, enjoying the near dictatorial powers to do as he pleases.
It
is another question if he feels fallible enough to do so when his life span runs
out and he greedily does not wish another incumbent to have the level of power he
does. I somehow doubt that age will change the stance, as then it is dynastic politics
he will be aiming for.
It
is one thing to know what is good, what is needed and what can have a positive impact
on the political future of this country, but it is a wholly different concept to
believe it is possible and doable under the present system. People now wish for
the old pre 1972 constitution with a dual chamber, the senate and the first past
the post. We have gone through the whole circle and found ourselves with more than
we bargained for, as we made huge assumptions about the sincerity of our politicians
and the honesty of those in elected office. We were hugely mistaken about both and
we have got the system that we can least justify using a common sense approach.
The
only ray of hope lies in a UNP manifesto, which if it includes the abolition of
the Executive Presidency, it will in fact be attempted, and it will only be parliament
that will ultimately decide, once it is put for a free vote and hopefully secret
ballot of MPs. There is hope yet, but the current set of rascals who claim to take
the moral high ground are the least likely to carry it through. The people of Sri
Lanka on the other hand may prefer a strong leader, if they believe that a change
will permit coalition and indecision.
No comments:
Post a Comment