The
Daily News quoting legal sources, which in its case means a Government stooge
or sycophant! Said the CJ should desist from hearing cases until the
Impeachment procedure is over and she is exonerated. Are they so stupid to make
a statement like this? The govt could drag this forever in its usual way, and
then we have a Court without a CJ, what nonsense is that. It is perfectly
acceptable to preside over the Bench while these proceedings, akin to ones
brought in by a Kangaroo Court, now presided over by Kangaroo MPs of the
Government side. Otherwise the wheels of justice will grind to a halt in Sri
Lanka.
It
is important to let the law take its course, as now a motion however
implausible and hilarious has been brought by a government. I suspect jokers
such as the previous CJ Asoka de Silva, previous AG Mohan Peiris and the
Constitutional Law Professor GL Peiris have drafted the allegations, and either
they are doing the bidding of the President as yes men, or they are morons to
bring such nonsensical charges before Parliament.
It
is tragic that the Parliament is made a laughing stock of the world. It is also
sad that the Government parliamentarians do not realize that or do not care as
their interests are not about credibility in the world, just the ability to do
as they please as elected representatives and fatten their pockets.
The
reading public, who I assume have a little more thinking power than most must
realize that whilst we hold the CJ to a different standard than the “malu kade
mudalali” and look differently at the same offence committed by both, we must also
realize that those who are in Parliament are also worthy of their position, and
not act like the “malu kade mudalali”. So when a “ malu kade mudalali” drafted impeachment
motion is presented to a supposedly ‘AUGSUT’ body of the Parliament of Sri Lanka,
it must be treated with scorn, and dispatched out of order in a legal and transparent
manner.
Further
‘malu kade mudalali’ tactics are being resorted to by the Government when it does
not appoint the majority to the Parliamentary Select Committee from the Opposition,
just as it did not do so for the COPE chairman, and thus bring into disrepute the
legitimacy and transparency and objectivity of that body. It therefore further reinforces
the “KANGAROOS IN THE COURT” who are trying to impeach a double doctorate, despite my personally disagreeing with many of her verdicts handed down by her Court!
No comments:
Post a Comment