Just when the country was demanding redress and fair
play from the onerous battles of existence and price spirals, there was the
Sarath Fonseka, remission of sentence to take the wind from our sails. That
calculated political gambit, has succeeded, albeit temporarily to take the
minds off our easily aroused public, courtesy of the insatiable appetite of the
media for political gossip. This is I repeat at the expense of everymans’
desire to improve their standard of living.
The incessant drums of the ruling clique that play
into our fear and insecurity of violence keeps the people from demonstrating on
behalf of their grievances and patent injustice. The inability of the
opposition to penetrate this vice like grip that the regime holds using the
powerful tools of media and advertising to spread misinformation, are
frustrating those who wish to see the rule of law and order prevail and many
would say restored.
In this scenario, I hope the winds of the SF release
will simply blow away never to return and be just wishful thinking of short
sighted political opportunists like Sajith Premadasa, back by an unlikely
coterie which include Buddhika Pathirana, Ranga Bandara and Harshana Rajakaruna
desperate for some reflected glory on the back of SF. As if that was not shame
enough, their attempt to back SF as a future leader of the UNP or worse of the
country shows their lack of honesty and integrity.
The saying ‘what goes around comes around’ will fix to
their rear ends, when they realize the folly of tagging to coat tails or motorcade rides, take
your pick.
The priority of all sane people who work untiringly
for the good of their country, should be only to ensure that all political and democratic
means are adopted to restore the rule of law and order in the Island and then
secondly implement the Constitution of this country that we have undertaken to
uphold, and if there are any constitutional provisions that are ill timed, and
irrelevant as vestiges to be removed, they should be eviscerated from the constitution
by a government that holds a two thirds majority so to do. This is a lifetime
opportunity that has to be undertaken before long if the interests of the
country are paramount.
The rest of us must agitate in a manner that is
effective, so the particular injustices we are subjected to are removed from
practice, as the law itself is usually clear on many of them, though the
independence of the supreme court is suspect, and therefore the wrongdoers do
not get justice, whilst like in the SF case retributive injustice was meted out
to this highly flawed but hugely talented individual who nevertheless
contributed significantly to winning the war against the LTTE.
No comments:
Post a Comment