Reports, can be true and then again
maybe false, that President Sirisena is most upset with the FCID, PRECIFAC ,
CID and Bribery Commission over the arrest of Ghotabhaya Rajapakse and three
former Navy Commanders over the Avant Garde case. Why I know not, due to their obvious
involvement in conduct outside the law of the land, but then Sirisena has
another world view it seems! Or is it?
If the report is in fact true, were they
made recently at an event honoring service men for gallantry, or at another
event, where retired service personnel from all 4 services have been asked to
return to help the motherland in its development effort, and so just an off the
cuff remark to boost their sagging morale?
Let us figure out the pros and cons of
this argument. Yes, we mere onlookers have no insider information on how the
FCID and others, choose who to prosecute, which cases bear merit for immediate
prosecution, which need further investigation before being brought to court
etc. Remember for all the guffaws, under Yahapalanaya you are innocent until
PROVEN guilty, so investigations take a long time, and we are not in a WHITE
VAN MARA era anymore, though many cretins in Sri Lanka still wish we should be
living under such out of control maniacs!
We can therefore only assume that there
is fair play, by people the President has appointed from the recommendation of
the PM. As if to add spice to the story Namal Rajapakse claims to have said
that some investigating officers were worse criminals than those they are
prosecuting!
Speak for yourself first for even talking I would say, as he still
holds on to his attorneys license, obtained fraudulently, where if it was
applied universally, every Sri Lankan would be an attorney! Further he has a
litany of crimes that are currently under investigation, having done so much
harm to people, second only to his father, neither of whom cohorting as lawyers
can see their behavior as criminal, when the rest of the world can.
There was another story that the President
was making these allegations, to protect his political survival. He must have
paid heed to overstated allegations that people who saved this country from
LTTE terrorism have been selectively chosen to be attacked by rogue LTTE
elements in the Govt. taking the upper hand. In Human Psychology this is common
amongst insecure, incompetent or untrustworthy people, so there you are!
I remember that Lacille de Silva was
removed from was it FCID secretary role, some time ago, but no real reason was
given. Was he also too conscientious in following the letter of the law?
Sirisena is trying to balance political alliances that have selective amnesia
for law breaking.
This may also have something to with
Intelligence Service Officers who have been remanded for murder of Thajudeen
and Lasantha Wickrematunga from instructions from above, where the cases are
still pending for more evidence. We don’t know if these same officers are under
threat NOT to disclose who gave them the kill orders, as some have mixed up who
they should be loyal to, man or country!
We must not forget that Sirisena is in a
difficult spot as he was collectively responsible for the MR Fatwa, as in
collective decision making of the Cabinet, and so is indirectly liable for the
crimes of the previous regime, and is ONLY painfully too aware of this fact.
The bottom line here is, IS he just
another traitor of the Country, like MR?
I believe our politicians have LOST
sight of what is in the Country’s interest and what is in their
personal/political interest of survival. Here the President MUST put his
personal agenda aside and work for the Country, he is sworn to govern, those
with him and those against him. He has NOT matured to that level YET.
However flawed Ranil Wickremesinghe is,
he must stick with him to whom he owes his whole political survival and present
position till 2020. All bets are off after that point, but we need some
stability at least to return to equilibrium, and growth is NOT what we should aim
at, as that only happens if other factors are FAVORABLE. Let us NOT stoop to
the level of the Rajapakses anymore in justifying our action. We have
progressed from that point now.
Let us remind ourselves that it is the
forces that won the war, whose leadership be it Gota or Fonseka is
questionable. They are both highly flawed characters, neither of whom accept
their inadequacies but were needed for specific tasks they fulfilled.
Getting back to Sirisena, he MUST stop
trying to play honest broker, which will only destabilize the political system
that must run unhindered till 2020 despite the huge flaws that have continuously
plagued by it since independence.
In time the crooks will one by one be
prosecuted and punished, and they know it, so are making these innuendos to
delay the inevitable. A country can only develop and its people can improve the
quality of life, ONLY when corruption is reduced drastically, as even China has
discovered. We can do it, and let us not allow the politicians to stop us in
our tracks, as their agenda differs from ours!
By the way for your interest AIYO is part of the Oxford Dictionary!
Dharisha Batians article worth reading in the FT.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ft.lk/article/573394/The-political-blind-spot
As President Sirisena makes his speeches off the cuff, and without notes or written up, this is NOT good practice, as he tends to tailor his speech to the audience at hand, and therefore what he said resonated with the people he was with at that time, and he did not think any further.
ReplyDeleteThis is typical Grama Sevaka talk, not suited for a President.
The utterences of a President of a Country must be carefully considered. as other people's lives and his Country's destiny depend on it.
For President Sirisena to have treated this so lightly but to have caused a huge stir in every corner of the land, is a reflection of his lack of stature, not Presidential Material. He is bound to fall on his own sword and does not need any assistance, as he is not one to seek or heed advice from others either.