The Bharatha Laxman murder case verdict
is in, and it is NO SURPRISE TO ME.
If you followed the case closely, and
you know the law, and saw the evidence, it was a clear cut case of a bunch of armed
gangsters out to kill a person or persons for whatever personal reason they
had!
If the whole case was read by an
independent JUROR with ALL NAMES OF THE PERSON REMOVED and referred to as A, B,
C etc that is what the Jury verdict would be. However even if we went on a jury
trial in Sri Lanka, due to the fact that both parties are known people TO ALL
JURORS, personal prejudices will outweigh those of objectivity, and the verdict
COULD BE different.
I therefore, feel that even though the
majority verdict was reached by the judges, there are personal prejudices at
play here, over and above the LAW which may have affected their opinion. I am
convinced that NO tampering of justice took place on the part of the present
Government to prejudice the case, though I am sure pressure may have been on
the judges from OTHER INTERESTED parties, who are very influential in Sri
Lanka.
In the end it is sifting thorough all
the evidence and coming to a conclusion as to intent, as this was NOT A WALK in
the park that turned into violence. When the time and place are taken into
account along with the period of impunity that existed during the MR regime, it
is as clear as daylight that the accused were guilty as sin for this murder.
What is regrettable is that Mahinda
Rajapakse DID NOT permit the true course of the Law to take place in this instance,
just as he has not in other murder cases UNDER HIS WATCH, and therefore he is actually
guilty of sins of omission in this regard, and has lost his moral authority to even
opine on this issue, which no doubt he will till the COWS COME HOME as there are
enough people willing to listen to him, and the stories of how much was donated
to what cause with reminders of pictures of old women being kissed etc.
No doubt this whole episode will be politicized
AD NAUSEAM and be ridiculed as a political vendetta by those who disagree with the
verdict. That is the fault of the people’s lack of objectivity on what is right
and wrong. We now have to see what the future holds and what real punishment the
accused will get! Even here it may turn out that the law is not equal, wanna bet!
It is right not to get personal and political on this issue. There was a murder. It was investigated. The state prosecuted it and the 3 judge bench found 5 of the defendants guilty by a majority verdict. That is all.
ReplyDeleteObviously there will be an appeal, and I don't know on what grounds, but lawyers are paid big money to find technicalities and thereby drag this to when I am dead! Just hope the defendants are not allowed to be free during the appeal process, as otherwise you have murderers walking the streets.