Time for a unified approach to managing
or running these floating armories. Who can impose?
Just imagine if there are floating
armories all around the world, purportedly being used to save merchant shipping
from Pirates! Actually they are ALL EXTRA JUDICIAL as they are not even
technically controlled or answerable to the Country to which the armory is
flagged. IN SHORT PRIVATEERS.
In this case the GOSL was sucked in to
lend its own arms to our sole privateer, Avant Garde for which it received a
certain amount of money! Whether the amount received was reasonable when
compared to the risk taken is debatable and a moot point at present.
It is apparent that floating armories
are NOT regulated, and under no international jurisdiction, and no treaty (with
signatories) has been signed regulating what is permissible here. They were set
up to counter acts of piracy to protect Merchant Shipping, and NO country was
willing to take over responsibility of policing the high seas, so the shippers
had to pay to do it.
Floating Armories was the resulting
compromise, and the UN would rather forget about their existence, as they are
unable to enforce any regulation, as no one is willing to pay for a fleet of
ships for the UN!!!!!
Considering the Shipping companies are
paying over US$2B a year for protection, this big time protection racket could be
run by the shipping companies themselves, after all they have their own ships!
They would however rather contract this work
to third parties, as they believe it will cost them much more, as the pirates themselves
run the floating armories. Their risk advisers have informed them that if they try
to do it alone, all the current floating armories will become the pirates to threaten
them!
I trust the reader now realizes what a highly
sophisticated protection racket it has turned out to be. It is the largest such
business, bigger than the Mafia that the world has ever seen due to the trillions
of dollars of shipping that straddles the world trade.
With just in time production,
and logistics, ships cannot delay even one day, as the production lines of car assembly
plants or I phone production lines depend on the logistics of the movement of parts
and products around the world.
With increasing international terrorism,
it is most likely that the US will use its Navy to threaten the destruction of any
ship thought to assist terrorists and thereby keep them in check. The US Spy Satellites keep a close check on their movement on a daily and hourly basis, to monitor all arms movements of any significance.
Given all of the above it is better for the SL Navy to manage this business through a private subsidiary such as Rakna Lanka in preference to subcontracting it out to privateers due to the sensitive nature of the work at hand, how it is done is the question for another day.
No comments:
Post a Comment