The personal staff of MPs amount to
about 5 people with total income of about Rs200,000 a month and on top after 5
years there is a type of gratuity due them in lieu of pensions etc. as their
service is NOT permanent like Govt. Servants.
In addition Ministers have another 10
position or thereabouts at their disposal at a cost of over Rs500,000 a month
and some of these positions have expensive SUV as part of the fleet and petrol and
the use of drivers from Ministry pools and this is in ADDITION to the Ministers
own perquisites of pay, and allowances and vehicles.
Conniving ministers don’t even distribute
these amongst those who have helped to put them there, but are even purloining some
these benefits for themselves, which shows how greedy they have become. Many of
these entitlements are from October 2015 so current appointments have a backdated
amount coming to them that can add up to quite a bit.
The Media or the General Public are not told
of all these, who are in these positions, as many who are in name only don’t actually
get the money. Sometimes they may get the funds into their bank accounts, but they
are supposed to hand over the money, so whoever the minster designates should get
the money are actually given it. It may be an unnamed mistress, or a hangers-on
which the people don’t know anything about. The official names are of different
people, and they may even get an ID card with their status, or driver or media secretary
or such like!
Most ministers don’t want their constituents
to know who is on their lists receiving all this largesse, as there may be many
who are appalled at the choices of people in these roles, usually rogues from the
previous governments called into teach the Minister how to steal in the same way
he did in the past. Whilst I may sound cynical, this is in fact how it is done.
There is NO transparency at all, and I trust
the RTI will expose all these, so elected representatives have a duty to their constituencies
to disclose, who actually gets what is dished out by the state for positions. It
is important that this information is open for scrutiny, as otherwise there is sometimes
inaccurate speculation on this information, as no minister actually divulges who
is getting what.