Australia does not arrest unless they have done their homework thoroughly. If they make a mistake taking in an innocent even on suspicion its millions they will have to fork out, for their mistake as a reputation could be ruined due to the idiocy of the act, and someone has got to pay. So think of the possibilities in store now! Read on:
The Australian anti-terrorist unit is suddenly faced with the
fact that they have truly, right royally f****d up in the investigation of the
Kamer Nizamdeen, case, in falsely accusing an innocent kid of links to
terrorism.
It all seems to have arisen out of the discovery of a
notebook containing intentions of probable terrorist activity within Australia,
where there is also reference to his personal diaries that are very specific in
nature relating to such terrorist activities of a very sinister nature, that were
planned to be carried out.
Obviously, the brain dead Australian detectives only mental
arithmetic is that if the name somehow sounds Muslim and there is a document
somehow that refers to terrorist activity, that it is a slam dunk case, that
required immediate arrest, as a threat to the state, and they will simply lock
him up and throw away the key.
You can see how foolish and idiotic that is, but in a land of
many who have descended from Criminals, who were shipped there, so they can be
forgotten, you cannot expect them to have anything other than a criminal
mindset anyway!
To put it another way “you judge others by your own standards”.
If your standards are warped, then you have a problem in objectivity, and you
are clearly misguided.
To cut a long story short, they (the Australian Detectives
Investigation this ALLEGED plot) are in DEEP SHIT. They have no way of saving
face, as they will simply face the sack, due to their gross incompetence. SO
what do criminals get up to in such a circumstance? They are now busily engaged
in creating their own web of intrigue, manufacturing non-existent evidence,
making up stories, getting corroboration from seemingly innocent people, by the
use of threat, and in a world of fake news, want to cover their fakery, by deciding
that his openly and unequivocal defense from his homeland, of ALL religious and
racial persuasions are simply cast as fake news.
While a whole case of lies is being drawn up as TRUTH,
President Trump for once has even better company in the form of the Australian
Police Force, in re drawing a story to cover-up their gross incompetence because
Australia will NEVER be able to live it up with this case, which has taken a
turn, no convict heritage detective could have imagined, due to their ignorance
of the status and stature of their legal immigrants or students of the present,
who have to go through hoops if they are to come to Australia. No dead-beat
terrorist sympathizer can come through the cracks today, only those who can be brainwashed
within that SORRY ASS country, which does everything in their power to create a
divided country, by not being sufficiently inclusive of all foreign people, who
instead of being accepted with open arms into their fabric of society are
looked upon in suspicion, which angers the looked upon to teach these Neanderthals
with a convict past a lesson or two in Human Rights.
This guy has been denied his human rights with this
accusation, and the PTA Act of Sri Lanka looks like a walk in the park when
compared to the charges filed to keep him under lock and key and be tortured to
extract confessions if that is possible, using mind reading and bending
techniques to save face.
The mind really BOGGLES. What is happening in Sydney in the building
this guy finds himself in, with the person really guilty of the crime of
planting false information, just to get a smart kid in trouble salivating at
the thought that he has ruined the life of a very (some would consider too
intelligent for their own liking) bright kid with a wonderful career ahead of
him. This rotter did not like foreigners who were too off the charts with
ability, in comparison with the dick heads that litter the Country of
Australia, stolen from its true inhabitants.
If you need any evidence for my theory, just see what happened
to the true natives of Australia. Those few who remain have their lives ruined
in one way or another, purposely kept in a state of delirium, so that what is
truly theirs does not have to be returned to them in the first place. They have
NO SHAME.
This act of aggression against a fellow human is true to character
of the Australian State that treats boat people like dirt, as if they don’t even
exist by sending them to hell holes like Nauru or Papua New Guinea, is
indicative of a Country in decline, but still unaware of how badly morally
bankrupt, they are.
I don’t know if we will ever get to the bottom of this
particular case, as truth is the first thing that goes out of the window, when
there is a cover up. We may have to wait decades, until books are written and
films made to finally get some kind of realistic idea of what happened, why it
happened, and why it was covered up, and the innocent lives sacrificed due to
this miscarriage of justice.
The only lesson we can learn from this, is that to accuse
anyone of anything and follow due process, it is better to err on the side of
the accused rather than on the accuser as the consequences are far greater if
they are wrong on the credibility of the security forces, on which the faith of
the whole country depends, than the possibility of a terror plot that goes off
with a few people who get killed. Reader, don’t forget that there are hundreds
of investigations being carried out for terror related events today, this was
simply one that just went too far, due to an idiot in the investigation team
who wanted GLORY!
http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2018/09/how-sri-lankas-press-is-reporting-mohamed-kamer-nizamdeen-terror-arrest.html
Here below was from the article in today's Daily Mirror News Paper
http://www.dailymirror.lk/plus/article/Will-Kamer-be-cleared-of-accusations-Shocking-arrest-of-popular-Sri-Lankan-PhD-student-in-Australia-155051.html
It is too early to comment on the detention of 25-year-old Kamer Nizamdeen, a popular PhD student affiliated to the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, Australia as the matter is under investigation by the NSW Joint Counter-Terrorism Team. His arrest on accusations of planning terror attacks has shocked almost everyone in the University and back at home in Sri Lanka as his life in Sydney was a story of successes with robust achievements, respected and admired.
It is bewildering that such a man could suddenly get ‘radicalised’ almost overnight as widely publicised worldwide without any evidence of any extremist comment being heard from him at any time by any of his colleagues. It is well known that a radicalised person cannot hide his views though he can hide his conduct and activities. How is it that there is no independent corroboration from his associates or his closest circle in the university that Kamer was no longer the same man they knew?
The only evidence known so far on which he was arrested on August 30 (Thursday) was a notebook allegedly containing references to former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, former Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, references to Sydney Opera House, police and railway stations allegedly found in his room. Though the exact wordings are not in any media, the PhD student will have to explain what the notebook contents were all about. We do not know his version because we have not heard the police or the media quoting Kamer in their reports.
It is difficult to believe that in a country where seven prime ministers were displaced in ten years and the last one Malcolm Turnbull was ousted by his own party colleagues on 24th August 2018, the Sri Lankan student could have had any ideological or religious reason to ‘terrorise’ Turnbull. There appears to be no evidence that he had plans to terrorise the former Prime Minister or former Foreign Minister at any time they held office.
PhD student
Kamer was no simpleton; he was a bright, well-integrated PhD student and staffer at the UNSW. It is mind-boggling as to how his alleged ‘terrorism manifesto’ would be left in the open space of his shared room in the university premises carelessly for someone else to so easily ‘stumble upon’.
Kamer’s brother, in a Facebook Post on Monday 3rd September, has expressed the view that Kamer was framed. “His accomplishments within the university in UNSW speak for themselves and he would have had absolutely no reason to engage in such disgusting, hateful crimes to a city which has been extremely opening to him for the past 6 years,” the brother wrote.
Crime Reporter Sally Rowsthorne of The Sydney Morning Herald of Friday 31st August, noted “those who knew the Sri Lankan postgraduate student were in shock after the arrest with multiple friends and neighbours saying that they wouldn’t believe what Mr Nizamdeen is accused of doing”. ABC also quoted the police saying that they do not believe that Kamer was capable of carrying out a terrorist attack.
Except for the contents of the notebook, which are also capable of innocent explanations, there does not appear in the media any evidence of any previous expressions of opinion or conduct on Kamer’s part that would support the serious allegations made against this up and coming talented youth, whose future is on the brink of ruination. But then the investigations are continuing, we need to wait. However what is clear to this writer is that additional evidence notwithstanding, the sum total of the material against Kamer do not amount to even an attempt or a conspiracy to commit an offence known to the law as applied in countries which have not embraced oppressive Counter Terrorism laws or the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Law. Jotting down one’s views in a notebook cannot by itself constitute an act of terror.
The reported facts as distinguished from speculatory comments, such as alleged membership in the ISIS, do not appear to qualify as a terrorist or attempted terrorist act
There must be evidence of actual preparation or an engagement or assistance to commit a terrorist act, which appears to be lacking in this case. The reported facts as distinguished from speculatory comments, such as alleged membership in the ISIS, do not appear to qualify as a terrorist or attempted terrorist act under Australia’s Criminal Code Act of 1995 or under terror laws applicable in the New South Wales. Membership in ISIS itself is however, an independent terror related offence. There is no evidence of any “intimidation to advance a political, religious or ideological cause and the act causes”, the way a terrorist act is defined in the Australian Act. The phrase “and the act causes” would necessitate the act of intimidation causing actual ‘intimidation’, often ignored by investigators who probably want to demonstrate their ‘smart detection’ to their superiors! But Australia as a country maintains a high standard of judicially supervised investigative mechanism. It is possible that he would be and should be cleared of the accusations, subject however to some extra ordinary, but unlikely links with a terrorist organisation being discovered or due to some external pressure from racist entities.
Speculative comments
Dinoo Kelleghan in Sydney writing to The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka) of 2nd September 2018 has made reference to highly speculative comments spicing the story which are unsupported by evidence. One example is that Kamer “acted as a lone wolf using his campus activities as a cover” which earned a sub-title in The Sunday Times, leading to a permanent damage to a man who had ‘networked into the university where he studied, worked and mentored students, and through projects that brought him plaudits by UNSW.’ Kelleghan reported further as follows: “Police say the PhD student is affiliated with the IS but are not charging him with being a member of the terrorist organisation.” But NSW Acting Detective Superintendent Mick Sheehy is quoted in the next sentence as having said, “From the documentation we believe he would affiliate with the ISIS”.
One will easily see the propaganda hype to make the suspect appear to be linked to ISIS, the earlier one claiming Kamer is affiliated with the IS while the subsequent one stating that ‘he would affiliate’ with the ISIS.
Kamer Nizamdeen had no previous criminal records prior to August 30. But were the police rushed into arresting Kamer with such weak allegations possibly by external elements? NSW’s Surveillance Device Act of 2007 and other terrorist related laws permit the police to conduct surveillance to establish more sound and credible material against possible real terror suspects. Why was he not monitored at least for a few more days, which smart investigators often do before rushing to arrest? What was the urgency? Did the elements that may have pushed the police to arrest the Sri Lankan forthwith have an agenda to create a realistic impact on the then ongoing Defence Seminar in Colombo, which commenced here on Thursday 30th August?
Day Two of the Defence Seminar on Friday 31st August morning session had two relevant presentations to the subject under discussion in this article. One by Lt. Gen.(Retd) Orit Adalo, managing director of Adalo Consulting Ltd of Israel on ‘Ideological Polarisation’ and the other by Maj. Gen. Roger J Noble, United States Army Pacific, Australia on ‘Role of the military in Response to Violent Non-State Actors in a Destabilised International System’. Space constraints do not permit a detailed discussion, which may be written off by some as conspiracy theories. The news of Kamer’s arrest however hit the news media here only at the conclusion of the two day Colombo Defence Seminar, perhaps a little too late.
(The writer is a former Senior State Counsel and can be reached on mm_zuhair@yahoo.com)
